Friday, January 10, 2020

WHY MAKE IT HARDER?


Nearly nine years ago, then President Obama authorised his military to take out Osama Bin Laden, the mastermind and financier of Al Queda, the organisation that amongst many other acts of terror, had perpetrated the attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon a decade earlier. OBL was sequestered in an Islamic state purported to be within the orbit of US Allies.

The killing of the serious political leader of his time - although not actually a member of any state government - was widely held to have been acceptable by almost all democratically operating politicians of the world. The first Afro American President of the US received almost no condemnation for the actions of the military he was the Commander in Chief of.

Compare and contrast the reactions of an almost equally commanding majority of luvvies and flakes when the lawfully elected successor to Obama took equally decisive action to terminate the activities of another Islamic terrorist who had for decades killed numbers of US citizens along with uncounted fellow followers of a paedophile-so-called prophet, whose religious sects have remained almost unaltered for one and a half millennia.

One President who just happened to be revered as a Socialist appeaser - the other a no-nonsense capitalist who plays poker as instinctively as any card player.

Trump removed his troops from an area of Syria before taking a decisive action, leaving the wailing,  treacherous Democrats decrying his "abandonment" of Kurdish troops - when in fact his strategic move against ISIS leader Baghdadi (revealed soon as possible) had an entirely different outcome. Baghdadi headed off to compete with Epstein in a search of very young maidens.

A few days ago the second most powerful person in the Religious Sponsored Dictatorship of Iran also had an appointment with a drone and perished. It is claimed by some - who might actually understand some well-hidden truths from within a once powerhouse of intellectual thought - that considering the excesses of the now very dead terrorist they might well welcome his demise!

It is also suggested - with little reason to doubt it - that many of "The Spontaneous Mourners of General Suleimani" were motivated by emotions other than grief, instead having  been coerced into the mob activity that made for the TV spectacular of the last rites.

Now Dear Old Nancy - who clearly wishes to confirm for all that she is deserving of rest-home status - wants to proscribe the long standing Constitutional power of the President to ensure safety for all Americans, doing so by way of a Resolution in the House of Representatives. A power that US Presidents have held for many decades. Here is a hint Nancy: Mr Trump's actions in removing one of the world's arch fomentors of terrorism with only a carefully orchestrated, face-saving firing of a few rockets causing zero casualties (clearly all set up with cooperation from the Iraqi powers), without talking to the House Democrats, was precisely what was needed. I mean how trustworthy might the Squad be in truth when Shifty Schiff and the mentally damaged Addler have joined in with Nancy's stupidity with such alacrity?

Incidentally it's more than likely that the terrorist was funded in the first place by the crate of cash Barry delivered, in a vain, but doomed-to-fail effort at appeasing those who would not understand what the word meant.

Just as the "Wall" collapsed under a stream of truth via the underground media of books, articles, radio, TV (and the then new fax machines) - the theocracy that sustains the reign of terror delivered by Suleimani (and likely to continue by who ever replaces him) will eventually collapse under the same stream delivered via the Internet and smart phones. Iranians are a very smart people and eventually there will be an awakening but until then there is only force accompanied by more force, both military and economic, to constrain the mad mullahs and terrorists like Suleimani.

Why does the Democratic rank-and-file continue to believe that hating the duly elected POTUS will end well for the nation? Bipartisan support has enhanced the power POTUS wields in times of serious challenge such as the current times!

Trump has indicated on many occasions now that the oil situation is no longer a vital, strategic part of US policy. And three years with no war resulting from President Trumps efforts to MAGA, mean he has little wish to change things.

Open your blinkered hate-fuelled brains to realpolitik and shut up and be considered ignorant rather than gobbing off and removing every shred of potential doubt.

14 comments:

Snowflake said...

A wee bit too much sun today, old fella?

gravedodger said...

Right up there with your critical thinking flake

RosscoWlg said...

SnottieFlake way above your pay grade, thus comphrenshion level..everyone who reads No Minister knows you are a twat.

Why keep trying to reinforce an obvious point.

Psycho Milt said...

...the lawfully elected successor to Obama took equally decisive action to terminate the activities of another Islamic terrorist...

You seem confused. The pussy-grabber-in-chief's "decisive action" was to assassinate an official of a foreign country on the territory of a third country. If you think that's in some way comparable with the murder of Osama bin Laden (beyond the fairly obvious similarity that in both cases people were killed), you're a stranger to reason.

Now Dear Old Nancy - who clearly wishes to confirm for all that she is deserving of rest-home status...


You seriously want to go there?

... - wants to proscribe the long standing Constitutional power of the President to ensure safety for all Americans...

For people who speak English, that's "Nancy Pelosi wants to restore the legal checks on the President's power to commit the USA to an armed conflict without the approval of Congress."

Why does the Democratic rank-and-file continue to believe that hating the duly elected POTUS will end well for the nation?

Unintentional comedy. Swap out "Democratic" with "Republican" and you could ask that question of pretty much any No Minister post about Obama during his term in office.

Snowflake said...

Ross is drunk.

Andrei said...

"For people who speak English, that's "Nancy Pelosi wants to restore the legal checks on the President's power to commit the USA to an armed conflict without the approval of Congress."

No Nancy Pelosi is just miffed that her party is not the one getting to deecide whose country to destroy next and who gets to be wacked.

The Democrats have started far more wars than the Republicans and they are far better at deceit than Republicans

RosscoWlg said...

And in the Republic of Iran so beloved by SnottieFlake, Milt,Andrei et Al, they have bulldozed the the crash site, removed and tampered with .
evidence.

Wow gotta love these guys ..

Rusty Arrow said...

I must admit, I feel that Trump has been hard done by. It is sad, really, the way he has been so poorly treated by the media and by other world leaders.

Trump is the shining light, the beacon on the hill, the beam of light guiding ships away from hazards.

Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize.

“I’m going to tell you about the Nobel Peace Prize, I’ll tell you about that. I made a deal, I saved a country, and I just heard that the head of that country is now getting the Nobel Peace Prize for saving the country. I said: ‘What, did I have something do with it?’ Yeah, but you know, that’s the way it is. As long as we know, that’s all that matters… I saved a big war, I’ve saved a couple of them.”

What a fucking childish moron Trump is.

gravedodger said...

@Rosco if the mounting evidence pointing to an own goal ever results in confirmation I guess the perp will have memory loss that often accompanies removal of a head from a torso so we will likely never know.
The cover up continues apace!

Andrei said...

Its the same old same old Rossco - the drk arts of popaganda.

Those uncivilized brown fellas that have oil that should belong ton the master Anglo race are both devious and stupid

In reality the whole shoot down thing starts with an anonymous official having a word with a reliable NYT reporter about an idea they want to float and before the dust is settled the idea the powers that be want planted in gulliable sheep such as yourself has taken hold.

Iran has invited Boeing engineers to Iran to assist with the investigation but they are not permitted to go by the State Department due to "sanctions™". Instead the USA demaands the Iran hands over the flight recorders but they wont be so dumb. And this will be portryed in the media as Iran being un co-operative.

And make no mistake you are gulliable, a follower, not a free thinker. The sort of person people like Hitler could use to gain power.

Will we ever know the truth be probably not - not until the day of judgement when all will be revealed

Rusty Arrow said...

Rossy, no credible media outlets are running first-hand accounts of your accusations. Some semi credible media, eg Newscorp, Fox, are repeating, but with no firm basis in fact.

Meanwhile, I am sitting home, scratching my balls, and wondering when Iran will let loose its fleet of killer dolphins.

Maybe it was a dolphin that launched the missile.

At least the Iranians haven't handed out medals like chocolates to anyone involved in this accident, unlike the US that gave gongs to all the crew of the USS Vincennes for displaying incredible heroism in the face confusion about their role.

Anonymous said...

Old news and fake news now, go to top of the blog.

RosscoWlg said...

Andrei, Musty Farrow and poor old SnottieFlake, another day, more facts come out.

Puts your continued support of dogma in the shade doesn't it?

Those tens of thousands, maybe hundred of thousands of Iranians marching in the streets now, let me guess, that in the warped CIA driven world you guys think exists those Iranians are asking for more oppression....right.

I'm not a free thinker Andrei...well go back through the last few days posts and while you pushed dogma I had already done a bit of lateral thinking and was well ahead of anybody else on this blog on the Iranian issue.

As for Hitler you maybe right I may have supported him, you would have to have read history and understood it, to understand my comment.

The difference between me and you Andrei, SnottieFlake, Milt and Musty Farrow is that I would have been in the armed forces while you dogmatic's clearly would have worn black uniforms and worked in the camps, starting at Dachau in the early 30' with the political prisoners!

Anonymous said...

That last comment is made by a very sick person and should be binned.