Saturday, September 24, 2016

REQUIRED READING FROM SOMEONE WHO HAS BEEN THERE, DONE THAT

New Zealand abolished the death penalty for murder in 1961 when MPs voted 41-30 in a conscience vote on a Bill sponsored by the Labour Party.

The death penalty for treason remained on the statute books until it too was abolished in 1989.    I suspect that if a proposal to reinstate the death penalty was put to a referendum today it would be soundly defeated.

IMHO a large number of people calling for state sanctioned killing (and please don't sidetrack the discussion by introducing the question of abortion) would be those who are quite happy to view death at a distance but who would run a mile when confronted with it in real life.    In that context I was interested to read this article by Sermon Thompson ... someone who has been there and done that.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

His own words .... As superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary I planned and carried out that state’s only two executions in the last 54 years. I used to support the death penalty. I don’t anymore.

I was born and raised in the segregated South. I was 13 when Emmett Till was lynched for “flirting” with a white woman. I can remember upstanding black Christians expressing hope that his murderers would be caught and hanged. It seemed quite reasonable to me then that death was the only proportionate response for people who would so egregiously violate the norms of a society.

Years later, as a young law enforcement officer, I lost a close friend and a cousin — both law enforcement officers themselves — to execution-style murders at the hands of felons who were attempting to avoid arrest. I remember feeling that justice had been served when one of their killers was executed.

In 1994, during my interview for the superintendent job, I was asked if I would be willing to conduct an execution. I said yes. Oregon had not executed anyone in decades, but the death penalty was part of the criminal justice system, and I had to be prepared for all of the duties that a superintendent could be called upon to perform.

Shortly afterward, I was charged with executing two inmates on the penitentiary’s death row, Douglas Wright and Harry Moore.  Moore had been convicted of killing his half sister and her former husband, and he said he’d take legal action against anyone who tried to stop his execution. Wright was sentenced to death for killing three homeless men. He later admitted to killing a 10-year-old boy. He too had given up his appeals.

Regardless of their crimes, the fact that I was now to be personally involved in their executions forced me into a deeper reckoning with my feelings about capital punishment. After much contemplation, I became convinced that, on a moral level, life was either hallowed or it wasn’t. And I wanted it to be.

I could not see that execution did anything to enhance public safety. While death penalty supporters suggest that capital punishment has the power of deterrence, a 2012 report by the National Research Council found that research “is not informative about whether capital punishment decreases, increases or has no effect on homicide rates.”

I now believed that capital punishment was a dismal failure as a policy, but I was still expected to do my job. So I met with my staff and explained my position. I made it known that anyone who felt similarly opposed could back out of our assignment. According to state policy, assisting in the executions was voluntary for everyone but the superintendent. And yet each of those asked to serve chose to stay to ensure that the job was done professionally.

I’m a Vietnam-era veteran, and a law enforcement professional who has been trained to deal with life-or-death situations, as were many of my colleagues. We focused on carrying out our responsibilities and leaving everyone involved with as much dignity as possible.

I began to feel the weight of this undertaking while practicing for the executions. Teams rehearsed for more than a month. There was a full 'run through' of the execution every week.

The weight intensified during the executions, which took place eight months apart, and it didn’t subside until well after they were completed. I cannot put into words the anxiety I felt about the possibility of a botched procedure. I wasn’t certain how my staff would fare. These were the first executions in Oregon in over three decades. These were the first executions in Oregon to be administered by use of lethal injections. I was the first black superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary. All of these firsts had the potential to come together in a very negative way if my team made a single mistake.

Planning an execution is a surreal business. During a prisoner’s final days, staff members keep the condemned person under 24-hour surveillance to, among other things, ensure that he doesn’t harm or kill himself, thus depriving the people of Oregon of the right to do the same. I can understand the administrative logic for this reality, but it doesn’t make this experience any less strange.

During the execution itself, correctional officers are responsible for everything, from strapping the prisoner’s ankles and wrists to a gurney to administering the lethal chemicals. One of the condemned men asked to have his wrist straps adjusted because they were hurting him. After the adjustment was made, he looked me in the eye and said: “Yes. Thanks, boss.”

After each execution, I had staff members who decided they did not want to be asked to serve in that capacity again. Others quietly sought employment elsewhere. A few told me they were having trouble sleeping, and I worried they would develop post-traumatic stress disorder if they had to go through it another time.

Together, we had spent many hours planning and carrying out the deaths of two people. The state-ordered killing of a person is premeditated and calculated, and inevitably some of those involved incur collateral damage. I have seen it. It’s hard to avoid giving up some of your empathy and humanity to aid in the killing of another human being. The effects can lead to all the places you’d expect: drug use, alcohol abuse, depression and suicide.

But the job gets done — despite the qualms and the cost. That’s the way it’s supposed to work. Capital punishment keeps grinding on, out of sight of society.

The average citizen will never find himself looking a death row prisoner in the eye, administering a lethal injection and stating the time of death in front of observers and reporters. But we all share the burden of a policy that has not been shown to make the public any safer, and that endures despite the availability of reasonable alternatives.

I am encouraged that Oregon now has a moratorium on executions, and there have not been any in the state since the ones I oversaw. Nationwide, in the past few decades, executions have also been declining, from a high of 98 in 1999 to 15 so far this year. But people continue to be sentenced to death.

Since I retired from corrections in 2010, my mission has been to persuade people that capital punishment is a failed policy. America should no longer accept the myth that capital punishment plays any constructive role in our criminal justice system. It will be hard to bring an end to the death penalty, but we will be a healthier society as a result.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
I suspect the good ole US of A has some way to go before Thompson's dream becomes reality but it will happen and it won't be too soon when it does.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

I liked that he found it hard to do. In a civilised society it should be hard to kill someone and I have no desire to ever be put to the test about that and suspect most gung ho types that talk tough would wilt at the end as well. That Aussi pedophile on trial at present and thinks it all quite amusing sees me torn though - maybe he's worth an exception.

3:16

The Veteran said...

3.16 ... which one ... the now defrocked Priest?

Anonymous said...

The recidivism rate of crims who have received capital punishment is staggeringly low!

And let's face it, some people genuinely don't deserve to draw another breath.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hi-Fi_murders

Anonymous said...

Not sure about him being a defrocked priest Vet but in Thailand or the Phillipines (can't recall off hand) there is talk of bringing back the death penalty just for this one Aussi bloke who appears to be a monster of the most depraved kind. The trial basics were on the radio about Thursday I recall.

3:16

Shelldrake said...

Capital punishment is a final non reversible sentence. Think Taena Paora.

Shelldrake said...

Capital punishment is a final non reversible sentence. Think Taena Paora.

Redbaiter said...

The white line up the center of the road does not stop people from crossing over, but its there, and it keeps drivers on the side they're meant to be on.

Glass is easily broken however in a shop front, it often stands as a barrier to a potential thief.

The death penalty serves a similar purpose. It helps define and confirm the moral absolutes that any civilised society needs if its going to work.

Look at the lawlessness and amorality in NZ compared to Singapore.

David said...

As-salaam-alaikum

Worried of Tauranga says Look at the lawlessness and amorality in NZ compared to Singapore. as if that is, somehow, a compelling argument in favour of capital punishment.

A similar argument, to support the opposing case could well be Look at the lawlessness and amorality in the USA compared to NZ.

The Veteran said...

Red ... moral absolutes and the death penalty are mutually exclusive.

I am reminded of a Maori soldier I know and respect ... a gentle giant of a man, decorated for his service as a 'tunnel rat' in Vietnam. I interviewed him for the TV documentary 'Baptism of Fire'. Have never forgotten his words ... "Before I went to Vietnam I enjoyed hunting and eeling ... after Vietnam I realised life was sacred. I vowed never again to kill a single living thing". Powerful words indeed.

3:16 at 5.41 has it about right in his first sentence. You don't.

Redbaiter said...

" 3:16 at 5.41 has it about right in his first sentence. "

Really..??

That is about the wettest most hopeless argument you can use against the DP.

Any doubt, don't execute.

Simple.

As for your Vietnam friend, I bet he'd change his tune if some bunch of reptiles kidnapped his daughter, gang raped her, poured chlorine down her throat, cut her breasts off, set her on fire and stashed the body in a plastic rubbish bin.

The Veteran said...

Red ... he's earned the right to say that. Not sure about you. I feel sorry for those big brave people who pontificate at leisure on killing without the slightest idea
of what's involved.

The death penalty is not the hallmark of a civilised society. Actually it's an easy option. There are far harder options.