Monday, September 10, 2012

More Welfare Is Not The Answer


That Shearer guy is on fire but sadly just doing the same and expecting a different outcome is not a go.

Welfare has trapped too many families and their innocent vulnerable Children in an economic world that socialist shrills call poverty but I call insufficiency of resources already provided being directed to those vulnerable in the home.

We all know how The Clark Government wanted to expand the numbers of voters who depended for all their incomes or a substantial topup  so a call, "dont vote for those Nats or their allies"  as  they will attack your entitlements,  secured a locked in voter base at election time.

Welfare should be targetted, reduced in availability and replaced as a goal not expanded.

But what does Shearer propose, further delivery of welfare to children turning up at school hungry in the form of Breakfast.
That will be a big success, not.  However it will free up a few dollars for drugs, the pokies, booze, Sky TV,  Videos and the other absorbent things that sitting on your arse all day can access.

Any family who allow a child to arrive at school hungry needs intervention and soon, as it is about pride, budgeting, education and self-respect, all things that socialism and its love affair with expanding welfare ignores in its quest for a voter base.

More is not a solution

8 comments:

Judge Holden said...

"Welfare has trapped too many families and their innocent vulnerable Children in an economic world that socialist shrills call poverty but I call insufficiency of resources already provided being directed to those vulnerable in the home."

Good grief Take some remedial literacy classes, old guy. Unfortunately, the education system failed you. I suspect you were educated privately.

The Veteran said...

Hi Judge ... see the politics of hate and envy are alive and well in your tirade against those who exercise their right to a private school education.

But then again hate and envy is what you guys are very good at.

And as for the 'old guy' bit ... clearly ageism rules ok in your lexicon.

sad

Judge Holden said...

I neither hate nor envy the stupid, Vet. I pity them.

Adolf Fiinkensein said...

Acute self pity is such a hideous affliction.

gravedodger said...

Holden, you supercillious, vain, self-opinionated, socialist piece of shit, you clearly cannot understand any post I have ever made on this blog.
I neither care for nor read your comments I just delete them.
Should you ever attempt to engage with the points I make and others seem to have sufficient comprehension skills to make meaningful responses to, it will be a wasted effort.

You can load your unpleasant whining repetitive critique on your Barrow and follow it over the nearest cliff.

If you really want to improve anybody's literacy, get some help to Shearer, he is running for higher office, I am just indulging myself and having fun, that it causes you grief is of no consequence or satisfaction. I really and truly don't care.

I only left your fixated rubbish comment here to preserve context for the comments in response. I didn't read or give any thought to your comment on my other post today as it was the only one it got the 'button'

Do us all a favour and fuck off, you have never yet made a comment worth a pinch of goatshit.

Doug said...

Poor people will have more money to tithe to the Church if the State feeds the Kids. Labour supporting Churches who would have thought that possible?

Anonymous said...

Any parent/s who let their child go to school unfed, should be hauled in front of the beak and charged with failing to provide the necessities of life. No if, buts or maybes.

There is no excuse, absolutely none, to not feed your children. Evil personified, and then to give them a cop-out by feeding their kids courtesy of the tax-payer is enabling and perpetuating the horror.

Mrs Danvers

Paulus said...

As long as taxpayer cost for meals, breakfast, lunch, then tea can be deducted from the Working For Families"entitlement".