Richard Branson to Class of 2013: Do Something Bold
2 minutes ago
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
IT'S MOSTLY YOUR FAULT, STUPID.
Photo withheld.
Hey Duchess, here's a thought, if you do not want your mammaries on the worlds media, keep your freekin kit on.
You and the Duke are apparently educated to a higher level than many of us who are mere supporters of the Monarchy, so use the brains god gave you and take the necessary steps.
Be thankful the git that took the pics was only armed with a camera and not a .50 cal rifle.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
totally agree. The woman seems to have acted in some stupid manner. i really thought she had more clues.
Disagree.Putting the telescopic lens across public space into private space remains trespass.
Agreeing with Anon (no doubt before it's deleted for being Anon).
Taking photos with a telescopic lens from the range of 1km isn't really any different than looking through someone's window.
So if I buy a telescopic lens and proceed to take photos of you and your family conducting private business on private property, then get it published in the NZ Herald, you'll be fine with it? Otherwise you're a hypocrite
Can public figures never be private?
Let's not blame the victim but the photographer, the papers/magazines which paid for and published the photos and the people who buy the media that printed them.
Recording what people do in a public place is not equivalent to spying on them when they are relaxing in private - which everybody should be entitled to do.
It is reprehensible to take those photos, let alone publish them for the titillation of the great unwashed.
Public flogging is called for and would be totally justified in this case
Good God! Here I am agreeing with Mighty Kites.
Pom sheilas have (or at least one Pom sheila has) tits.
Shock! Horror!
When will the world grow up?
Forget the photos , imagine a snipers rifle instead,security is more of a worry .Think of the coup that some nutter ,proclaiming some "rights issue",maybe Arch Duke Ferdinand all over again.History does tend to repeat itself.
I don't think the British govt could promise to maintain a 1km line-of sight security cordon around royal family members at all times. Well, they could, but they'd be lying.
What a total beat up - some clothes peg gets her kit off, give me a break ( & get her a hamburger), for gods sake !
Royal Doulton is bringing out two small, but perfectly formed, jugs to commemorate the event.
Seriously though- if they have no right to privacy, when in a private place, who does?
Pay some paparazzi prick to stalk the editors of the sleaze mags 24/7. In the sack, on the dunny, picking their nose; and publish the results front page and then we'll see the sniveling
GD, don't agree with you this time.
(There's gotta be a better way of proving I'm not a robot)
Sorry Dave it is a problem for me when I visit other sites within our system ie Keeping Stock but way out of our control.
Thankyou for persevering though.
Post a Comment