Friday, March 30, 2012
Am I alone in thinking that the treatment of two ex party presidents was a little different.
One, a person who, so as to be able to perform the duties of assisting the election of a party by being appointed to several "cosy directorships on NGO boards, spent undisclosed money possibly from government funds trying unsuccessfully to find evidence of malfeasance by the leader of a rival party.
The other after leaving the position of president which I understand was fundeded from party funds, rendered substantial assistance to a fellow party activist in claims against ACC and an Insurance company.
The former activity almost passed beneath the radar of state TV while the latter was almost rabidly reported by an animated Walrus as the crime of the century while he desperately attempted to embroil the PM in what is becoming a beatup of epic proportions.
Just my right of center bias I guess