'Not guilty' is the verdict in the case against the bloke who allegedly shot at a boy racer's car with a .22 rifle.
Bit what about the evidence given by the little prick who had been terrorizing these people's livestock for a whole year? He told the court his car had been fired on and he produced the bullet holes and the remains of the bullets to prove it. (Conveniently omitted from this NZPA piece.)
Trouble is, the bullets didn't come from the accused's air rifle. Clearly, they were fired into the car by the little prick, after the event, to sex up the evidence. Pity he didn't check to find out if the accused owned a .22 rifle.
How could the cops be so dumb as to not properly investigate?
When will the little prick be charged, convicted and jailed for perjury?
August 28 in history
1 hour ago