Sunday, July 12, 2009

Yes, the eco-fascists could well rule the world, if we let them!

You might think my accordance with some views of the BNP in the post below makes me a fascist.

But no, as I noted a few days back, the real fascists are in the Green Party and among the environmentalists.

This week, we have seen world leaders committ themselves to halting the rise in global temperatures to 2c, with all it entails in reducing carbon outputs.

And think of all the tax and regulations we will need to make it all happen, even if Australian PM Kevin Rudd brands the deal a dudd.

Well, Al Gore has an idea: World government! Yes, the man making millions from jetsetting the globe to promote his discredited beliefs says US climate change legislation will help bring about 'global governance.'

Obviously, Ian Wishart was onto it in his book Air Con, and it does make one wonder about the role of our own Helen Elizabeth Clark in New York at the UNDP.

If this wasn't worrying enough, take a look at TOWMNBM's new climate change czar. He has some interesting views. In 1977 he co-authored a book advocating:

** Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not

** The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food

** Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise

** People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility.

Thus, I guess tax and regulation of our lives if barely the start of it, should the eco-fascists and their allies in government get their way.

But how is that climate change going?

Well, as noted before, temperatures are dropping, as Andrew Bolt issues in a regular reminder.

Hat tip: Andrew Bolt, Drudge Report


Psycho Milt said...

...the real fascists are in the Green Party...

This is not only a remarkable new definition of "fascists," but a remarkable new definition of "real" to boot. Has Oxford University Press been in touch yet?

Anonymous said...

More Obama bollocks from "Twat of the north"