Thursday, July 23, 2009

There It Is

Two hours and I'm cross eyed. I may have made the odd mistake but draw what conclusions you can. I can see when Adolf departed for Fiji on June 18th but the figures recovered well before his return onn the 28th.


Date Comments unique Vis All Posts FFM Adolf PM Gooner Lou Grant Barnsley
10-Jun 33 1221 4 2

2


11 38 1241 3 2
1



12 20 1214 5 2 2

1

13 24 1082 4
2
1 1

14 18 1054 3 2
1



15 43 1230 6
3
2 1

16 24 1163 5 2 2 1



17 35 1156 6 2 2 1 1


18 25 1030 4 2 1


1
19 7 997 3 3





20 14 694 3 2


1

21 42 840 4 2

1

1
22 6 1082 2 2





23-Jun 15 1033 3 2
1



24 24 1036 3 1

1
1
25 30 984 3 2

1


26 87 1061 6 1
2 1

2
27 12 845 3 1
1


1
28 17 749 3


2
1
29 34 1120 4 1 2 1



30 48 1145 6 2
1 3


1-Jul 19 1006 5 1 1 1 2


2 28 1128 8 2 3
3


3 40 1008 6 2 2 1 1


4 47 794 4 2 2




5 23 879 4 1 2
1


6 10 999 2 1

1


7 17 978 3 1 2




8 78 996 7 2 2 1 1

1
9 26 1050 4 1
2

1
10 9 906 2 1 1



1
11 16 718 4 2 2




12 19 827 3 2 1




13 22 1038 6 2 2 2



14 15 1555 4 2 1


1
15 9 934 3 2


1

16 11 998 7 2
2
3

17 7 849 2 2





18 15 821 7 2 1
2

2
19 4 719 3 2 1




20 20 1019 4 1 2

1

21 46 1982 9 1 4 2 1

1
22 16 1159 5 2 2

1

1

20 comments:

FAIRFACTS MEDIA said...

I think it was the posts on the ladyboys that brought them in :)
Either that, or the other No Minister bloggers were so shocked at seeing them that it made them write, some for the first time in ages.
And such a variety of writings proved very popular.

Adolf Fiinkensein said...

FFM as with your earlier observations on the correlation between post numbers and readership, your latest contention is not borne out by the facts. In fact you are flat out wrong. The reason I spent two hours analyzing the figures was to provide an opportunity for intelligent comment.

Your 'ladyboys' as you call them were not even in the frame during the time I was away. The fact is, the two highest rating posts during that period were one each from Milt and Barnsley featuring Berlesconi and Microsoft. Between them they attracted seventy-one comments.

Frankly I would be very happy to see you predeliction for 'Ladyboy' and other grotesque variations on human sexuality confined to The FairFacts Media Show. I can tell you I took down the picture from your last effort. It was the pits. You will find this feeling is shared by at least three other of our fellow authors.

Anonymous said...

No one wants to read the mad rantings of someone hell bent on posting blogs about all the depraved sexual capitals of the world as he tours then up to his back wheels in all the sites especially when it involves sex with either men or boys.

If I was in charge of this blog I'd boot him.

He adds nothing except distractions.

Inventory2 said...

Is your blog the place to publicly air your dirty laundry gents?

Just a thought ...

Adolf Fiinkensein said...

As far as I'm concerned IV2 it's not dirty laundry. Just robust comment and all the better for it to be in public. What's the phrase again? 'In the interests of transparency and accountability.....' etc etc

Anonymous said...

well, if it's you and three other "authors", ban him then and be done with it. the only thing worse than ffm's random, meandering posts is you whinging about it constantly.

ISeeRed said...

Sorry, but I don't see a row for how many comments each author attracted, just some aggregate figure on the left. This would really be the only of seeing who's hot and who's not with readers, right?

ISeeRed said...

"the only WAY"

Anonymous said...

Hmmmm, if you want more quality, maybe ban anonymous posters who write nasty, personal, irrelevant crap like the third post. Actually, just switch off anonymous posting altogether and require an e-mail address for anyone who wants to comment.

Adolf Fiinkensein said...

ISeered, It's just too difficult - that's why it took two hours just to get the aggregated figures. You have to manually count the comments and you can do that just as easily as I.

My impression is that there's no particular trend to be seen except perhaps for the fact that Milt's posts, which are relatively infrequent compared with mine, seem to attract more comments. He has an engaging style and sense of humour which comes through and of course, he's a DSM and I'm a salesman, don't you see?

You mean you don't know what a DSM is? Something to do with IT.

Adolf Fiinkensein said...

Anonymous, you have a strange conception of what 'constantly' is. In point of fact, it is you who has constantly whinged, often inventing imaginary infractions where there are none. If you don't like the content here then I suggest you fuck off and drown yourself in your own ego.

FAIRFACTS MEDIA said...

Adolf, you will see that my comment was party in jest.
Note, the little smile.
What I have noted is that the more posts we all make , the more comments and better ratings we get.
And yes, since Barnsley and Psycho comment less frequently, their posts are more often better considered or controversial and so they get more responses.

Anonymous said...

Adolf: Nazi by name, Nazi by nature.

Anonymous said...

hmmm, hitler's felchpig, why dont YOU "fuck off" and stick to your own blog if you're just so much more purer than the driven shit than regular rightwing riffraff. christ, your ego's so big it could apply for membership in the un.

ISeeRed said...

Hi Adolf. Yes, I suppose it is a lot more work if you've already had to do your basic summary manually. I just don't see why I should be the one who has to prove the point you are trying to make. Your approach doesn't show FFM generates fewer comments in proportion to the number of posts and should therefore have his posting curtailed.

Anyway, if you and some authors really think FFM doesn't add much, it might be better to warn him privately and then just withdraw his posting privileges if he doesn't improve. However, it's subjective. Myself, I get more turned off by Psycho's rather smarmy tone and dumb caricaturing of right-wingers, but I wouldn't demand he get removed, as he adds a bit of variety to the place too, like FFM.

FFM: lose the cock in the frock fetish. No one cares and it's not a good look, mate.

Adolf Fiinkensein said...

ISeeRed you are labouring under a misconception.

The purpose of this post was not and is not to try and rank authors as to so called effectiveness. Rather, the purpose was to explore the vearicy of some recent comments made to the effect that my own posts generated more readership than did those from other authors. They do not and this exercise shows that. It also clearly shows there is no relationship between the number of posts and either readership or number of comments. It is the quality of posts which draws people of quality to come in and then come back the next day.

In fact, the last thing I would want is to set up some kind of silly competition amongst authors and for that reason, even if it were easy to do, I would not post such an analysis. To my knowledge, all of us began blogging as an enjoyable hobby - for the fun of it. Unlike some other bloggers we are not striving to set ourselves up as a potential commercial operation, competing with the Antique Media.

When blogging ceases to be fun, authors will simply fade away, as has happened many times in the past. When one author continually irritates all the others, then that person will be asked to move on.

Anonymous said...

Adolf is right that blogging should be enjoyable.
With the bitching I have seen on this blog, the airing of dirty laundry, well some of it has been quite unbecoming.
I would expect that at least in public you would all defend each other for being on the same side.
Then you stick the knife in in private.
Wasn't that the National Party way?

Anonymous said...

Regardless of the way Adolf seems to be blowing his own trumpet, what I have noted is the nastiness of the leftards commenting on this blog.

My on my, they seem as bad as Cameron Slater!

Adolf Fiinkensein said...

Anon, you seem to have a strange idea of what is is to blow one's own trumpet. In point of fact, I have debunked those who were attempting to blow it for me.

Suggest you enrol for comprehension lessons.

Whaleoil said...

The latest Anonymous must be a social retard and dyslexic not to mention technologically illiterate.

Just as well they don't write for IT papers, they'd go poor on the fees.