The Guardian produced an interesting piece this week: How can right-wing pundits attack the most popular man on the planet?
An interesting piece and one certainly for us VRWC to look at and learn. But why do we attack the ObamaMessiah? Is it because we are racist? No!
Is it because he stands for so many things we oppose? Yes!
And has he been a naughty boy , as I and some of my colleagues have noted, yes he has!
I recall the outrage I received from my Tainted President post just after his election victory.
Why did I do that article? Well, I was sickened by the psychophancy of the media towards Him, plus that of much of the blogosphere.
How they had ignored the Messiah's many failings.
And we see that too this month with the adulation continuing after His inauguration.
Bloggers should aim to stir debate too. They should look at where the MSM doesn't. They should challenge the consensus.
As I noted last week, a media just sucking upto a new Messiah is bad for democracy, as it was in the Blair era for Britain. It did not produce good government.
The VRWC is part of the Fourth estate, it's role is also to be the eyes and ears of the public, particularly if the MSM is not carrying out this role.
Thus, we should continue to oppose the ObamaMessiah, point out his many failings.
Such judgement will pay off in helping keeping him at bay, stop him getting too cocky, and indeed, the MSM may well wake up to the fact that Barry is not a God but a mere boy, inexperienced in government, elevated to the highest office in a last gasp of influence by a media so keen to end a Republican epoch!
And should the Messiah fail in the many crises he must deal with, well, serious as it may be, when the world cannot afford failure, we can say 'we told you so.'!
But when he deserves it, I will praise him too.