If you read this morning's Herald you will see commentary from both Audrey Young and John Armstrong on the latest Herald DigiPoll which, among other things gives some brief respite to the Bilious Bitch.
The pieces mention that the poll was taken during and after Sir Roger Douglas's re-entry into politics which in itself gained ACT a week of wall to wall publicity. Yet these two experienced commentators make no reference at all to ACT's performance, or lack of performance, in this latest poll.
Wouldn't you think it a major news story if ACT had not improved or worse still, not registered, in spite of Sir Roger? An equally big story if they had improved?
Reading this stuff is a bit like eating a burger only to find afterwards there was no meat in it.
The final four, what do you reckon? [POLL]
27 minutes ago